8/20/20
Its a horrifying thing (in my opinion) that this ad is received positive by some moderates and conservatives. here is my list of mistakes and break downs. I think if we don't talk about glaring issues in media, we will end up with factoids, misleading content and/or faith healers.
-A politician dressed in expensive clothes walking down cleared crack alleys and low end environments is trying to relate to the locals?
- The streets being prepared and cleared of all people makes this connection even worse.
- stats the issue being a democrats problem, but doesn't explain how republicans or certainly who can fix it. Its concept is completely left open ended and at the end of it you may ask what it's trying to say other than democrats suck. It's an anti ad at this point and just another level of plateau of mud for the mud slingers.
-The quick cuts makes me think of things being cherry picked especially since the questions weren't always heard being asked.
-Talks about the city of Baltimore but simplifies its factual backing as represented by state ratio, if true should be shown in a chart or in a completely different way to give more detail to audience and be more clear, because as presented seems to indicate the fallacy of a single cause.
- A woman walks proud down the street, with no one around to signify her connection to the city of Baltimore, yet it is obviously been cleared out, which could imply that she herself is afraid that the camera might capture something or someone to defeat her purpose. hell, at that point add some actors at least. It takes away the idea of being relatable if your seen as being such a high class person that the streets need to be cleaned for you.
maybe I'm too hard on this? I didn't know a comic I made a month ago would come true so quickly, Mind you I thought this was the worst comic I've ever done, but relevancy resides. you see that is why my art work is so broad, predictable, and bizarre eventually I can call myself Nostradamus